On Jan. 19, 2014, Peyton Manning passed for 400 yards in a 26-16 victory over the New England Patriots that catapulted the Denver Broncos into Super Bowl XLVIII — which they lost in humiliating fashion to the Seattle Seahawks, despite Manning’s 280 yards through the air.

Horse racing software providers,using brisnet,TSN,ITS and Trackmaster Datafiles,thoroughbreds,harnessracing,standardbred and also quarterhorse handicapping software,free Selections,we have been providing handicapping software since 1995 on the internet.

Two years later, Denver and New England again played for the AFC Championship, but this time, Manning, clearly showing the effects of his 39.8 years of age and multiple neck surgeries, managed just 176 yards passing.

Yet Denver won. And on Feb. 7, 2015, the Broncos beat the Carolina Panthers in the Super Bowl, with Manning throwing for just 141 yards — the second-lowest total in his postseason career.

So, why am I talking about football and Peyton Manning in a horse racing article? It’s because I think Manning’s story makes the point that time matters when evaluating athletic performances.

Free Horse Racing Handicapping Software

Manning is considered by most to be one of the best quarterbacks in NFL history. His 71,940 career passing yards are the most ever (at least for now — Drew Brees and Tom Brady will undoubtedly have a say before their careers are over). He tossed 539 career touchdown passes (Brett Favre currently ranks second with 508) and was credited with 45 fourth-quarter comebacks (again, an NFL best).

Yet, the one opponent that Manning could not vanquish was Father Time, the great enemy of all athletes not named Tom Brady.

And time is even harsher on equine athletes, whose athletic lifespan is much, much shorter than the average human’s. This is why I think it is crucial that handicappers always keep the time element firmly in mind when analyzing a horse’s past performances. What was true a month ago, may not be true today and what is true today may not be true a month from now.

With this in mind, I created a time-adjusted speed rating (TASR for short) and tested it on my database of over 77,000 races. The rules were simple. To qualify, a horse had to have:

• A most recent TASR of 100 or greater, earned over today’s general surface (dirt/synthetic or turf).
• The best last-race TASR in the field.

Number: 6,041
Winners: 1,454
Win Rate: 24.1%
$2 Return (ROI): $1.86 (-7.04%)

Now, the first thing an astute horse player will notice is that the ROI on these steeds is half as negative as what one might expect from the race favorite — which is a great thing, especially since we are essentially looking at a single factor.

So, buoyed by this initial test, I added some additional criterion (listed below with my rationale and the test results):

• Horse must show at least one win over the past two years. (This eliminates maiden races and the plethora of first-time starters they often contain).

Number: 5,126
Winners: 1,277
Win Rate: 24.9%
$2 Return (ROI): $1.95 (-2.27%)

• Horse must have finished in-the-money (third-place or better) in its last start. (In my experience, a big speed figure earned in a poor effort is very suspect.)

Number: 4,174
Winners: 1,130
Win Rate: 27.1%
$2 Return (ROI): $2.05 (+2.52%)

Eureka, profitability at last!

Still, I thought the results could be better, so I added a price component. While I don’t think the morning line is the best way to assess overlays and underlays, it’s surely one of the easiest. So, with that in mind…

• Horse must be at least 3-1 on the morning line.

Number: 2,930
Winners: 620
Win Rate: 21.2%
$2 Return (ROI): $2.15 (+7.70%)

At this point, I know what a lot of you are thinking: This is all well and good, Derek, but it’s kind of useless without knowing how the TASR is computed.

Dark Horse Handicapping Software

Well, I’m afraid that will have to remain a closely guarded secret, only to be revealed under the threat of torture — like being forced to watch “The View”. However, I hope that readers will find value in the TASR concept. Heck, my method for determining the time decay of a speed figure may not even be the best method — it probably isn’t — but I hope it at least gets readers thinking along similar lines.

(For a list of qualifying speed plays this Saturday (Nov. 18, 2017), check out the US Racing Facebook page at www.facebook.com/betusracing.)

Safety in Numbers...

FormGenie brings computer-generated handicap/speed ratings for every UK and Irish horse race to your PC, MAC, Tablet and Smart Phone. Predicting horseracing winners with stunning accuracy since 2006. It's so easy to use and yet so impressive. First you choose your strategy (we advise a choice of two) and then select your User Mode (filter).

If after you subscribe to FormGenie, you see anything in our home page Results that differs from the selections/ratings provided (or explanations below) or is misleading in any way we will REFUND immediately on request without quibble.

Note: We aim to correct any possible unintentional errors in this results data within 60 mins of the last race of the day.

Note: The stated profit for the Bot is a guide only and may differ to the actual Bot performance as a consequence of substitutions/promotions/overlapping races/losing sequence (suspended profit). Due to the complexities o the Bot parameters it's only possible to state an estimated profit for the Bot. However, in the majority of cases the profit is understated and the losing sequence is overstated. This is made clear in the Bot's manual.

We try to be completely transparent with our reporting. As such, these daily results are from the Extreme User Mode where every UK and Irish race is rated by the program without any extra filtering as supplied to members at 6:30 AM without editing or manipulation and using the originally declared Going. Users may select other User Modes or Star-confidence to reduce the number of races analysed to improve strike rates further. Our recorded odds exclude Betfair (for reasons explained elsewhere). A limitation of our fast results feed means that, whilst different to our 365 day reports, non runners are not deducted and as such occasionally the each way SR may be incorrect. Odds quoted may exclude R4s.

BetFair SP is likley to be on average 15% greater than industry SP.

Note the industry forecast prices. You can see how often they are completely out of kilter with the actual market prices and note how well supported FormGenie selections are whether, Top Rated or Dutch Rated.

We have been proofing our selections to the racing post since 2015. As such, we are able to supply you conclusive proof of our selections on request.

The unambiguous selections are ranked and clearly indicated in just a few seconds with an incredible strike rate of both 'Top-Rated' only and 'Dutching'. Note the strike rate for Top-Rated Only' is calculated using the number of Top-Rated selections that win (or place at 5/1+ best prices), whereas the Strike Rate for Dutching is where the indicated Top or Dutch Rated wins (not just places). Both are betting systems proven over many years and results published every day.

Horse Racing Handicapping Software Progra…

Although users can change the 'going setting' to re-evaluate the runners based on a going change, these results are based purely on the original going description exported with the declarations file. For example, if the going at Newmarket was declared as GF then changed to GS after heavy rain we would expect users to change the going switch on the app, but we would not alter the original ratings/selections for the purpose of this reporting (to maintain transparency and credibility).